News and information useful to Cleveland-Marshall College of Law students, faculty and staff.

Impeachment Discussion Series & Resource Guide

image of C|M|Law flagAn “Impeachment Discussion Series” is being held for C|M|Law students, staff and faculty in the Learning Commons 12noon-1pm on Mondays October 21, November 4 and November 18.  The series will feature C|M|Law faculty leading discussions, and the primary focus will be on interactive discussion, not formal presentations – attendees are encouraged to with their own questions and observations to contribute to the discussion.  A C|M|Law Library Resource Guide has been compiled to complement the Discussion Series.  The Resource Guide provides information on, and links to, U.S. Constitution and U.S. Congressional materials, historical impeachment actions, and secondary sources.

This Just In: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life

On the heels of C|M|Law’s successful RBG: Justice Ginsburg Live via Skype Chat and RBG Film Screening comes one of the newest additions to our library’s collection Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life.

Jane Serron DeHart, a Professor of History and Women’s Studies, has written an in-depth, insightful, and groundbreaking work on the life and work of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The book, written in cooperation with Ginsburg, took 15 years to research and write. Dehart interviewed Justice Ginsburg, her husband, family, friends, and colleagues for the tome.

At over 500 pages, this a biography for biography lovers, legal historians, and fans of the “Notorious RBG.” Ginsburg’s desire for gender equality is a focus of the book. It covers her early life in Brooklyn, NY, time at Cornell and Harvard Law School, relationship with her husband, attempt to break into a legal career in the male-dominated law environment of the 1950s, work with the ACLU, and career as a jurist. Academics will especially like the 100+ pages of notes and bibliography at the end of the book.

The documentary film RBG is also available in our collection.

Free Online Research Tools:

  Oyez is a multimedia archive dedicated to providing free access for all to materials from and about the Supreme Court of the United States. The project is maintained by Cornell’s Legal Information Institute (LII), the Chicago-Kent College of Law, and An audio recording system was installed in the Court in October of 1955, and Oyez offers an extensive collection of transcript-synchronized and searchable audio recordings. Audio recordings can be accessed by locating a case, then clicking on the oral argument link. Once the media window opens, users can search within the transcript, play the entire recording, or click on a paragraph in the transcript to jump to that clip in the recording. Unfortunately, not all post-1955 cases have audio recordings available due to degradation of the original reels and other issues as explained here.

Oyez also features full text Supreme Court opinions, along with case summaries and decision information. If you are interested in learning more about individual justices from any time in the Court’s history, Oyez has detailed biographies. You can also view a virtual tour of the Supreme Court building and justices’ chambers.

Anti-SLAPP Legislation Proposed in Congress

US Capitol Building From consumer reviews, to speaking out on other matters of public concern, social media makes it easy for anyone to share their opinion on just about anything. But sharing critical opinions may cause some commentators to become the targets of lawsuits called strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP).  SLAPP suits are often filed by businesses against online reviewers in reaction to the reviewers’ negative comments about the business or its products. These types of suits are also filed in relation to other matters of public concern, and have a chilling effect on free speech in many forms of media. Several states have passed anti-SLAPP legislation that helps protect consumers and others from being silenced. However, this patchwork of legislation has led to forum shopping by plaintiffs and costly litigation for defendants.

Congress is now stepping in to the fray with HR 2304. Known as the SPEAK FREE Act of 2015, the bill is a bipartisan effort that would amend the federal judicial code to allow the defendant in a SLAPP suit to file a special motion to dismiss the claims. The suit in question must arise from statements, other expression or conduct by the defendant in connection with an official proceeding or matter of public concern. The bill defines “matter of public concern” as an “issue related to: (1) health or safety; (2) environmental, economic, or community well-being; (3) the government; (4) a public official or public figure; or (5) a good, product, or service in the marketplace.” The full text of the bill is available on, where you can also find related information and set up tracking alerts.

Fair warning: Ohio does not have anti-SLAPP laws, so think twice before you eviscerate your local pizza parlor on Yelp.

Updated Ohio Constitution Guide



Looking for information on the Ohio Constitution and current constitutional issues? Check out the Ohio Constitution – Law and History Guide, which has recently been updated. This research guide includes references to primary and secondary sources, information on Ohio’s previous constitutions and conventions, tables tracking proposed amendments, suggested resources by topic, and more.

The Court Decisions tab features brief summaries of Ohio Supreme Court opinions weighing in on constitutional law issues, now including very recent 2016 opinions. The research guide also features information on pending cases, and links to the Supreme Court’s docket and video recordings of oral arguments.

A new table was just added to track Proposed Bills and Resolutions that amend the Constitution and are currently before the Ohio Legislature. If you are looking for proposed amendments decided by Ohio voters, those can still be found under the Table of Proposed Amendments and Votes.

Another source for current constitutional issues is the Ohio Constitution News blog, operated in conjunction with the research guide.

Keep in mind that proposed amendments and constitutional revisions can be good fodder for upper level research papers.